The logic and role of meta-analysis in clinical research
- 1 August 1993
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Statistical Methods in Medical Research
- Vol. 2 (2) , 147-160
- https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029300200203
Abstract
The term meta-analysis refers to the quantitative combination of data from independent trials. Where the result of such combination is a descriptive summary of the weight of the available evidence, the exercise is of undoubted value. Attempts to apply inferential methods, however, are subject to considerable methodolo gical and logical difficulties. The selection and quality of the trials included, population bias, and the specification of the population to which inference may properly be made are problems to which no satisfactory solutions have been proposed. Insightful quantitative description ought not to differ materially from inferential conclusions; where discrepancies exist the inferential techniques should be regarded with extreme caution.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Some Progress and Problems in Meta-Analysis of Clinical TrialsStatistical Science, 1992
- Can meta-analyses be trusted?The Lancet, 1991
- Problems induced by meta‐analysesStatistics in Medicine, 1991
- An overview of statistical issues and methods of meta-analysisJournal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 1991
- Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: An overview of the randomized trialsProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1985
- The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.Psychological Bulletin, 1979
- In defense of generalizationBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1978
- Some Thoughts on Statistical InferenceThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1962
- Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ 2 TestsPublished by JSTOR ,1954