INVITATION PAPER (C.P. ALEXANDER FUND): THE POTENTIAL OF BIOLOGICAL CONTROL FOR MANAGEMENT OF GRASSHOPPERS (ORTHOPTERA: ACRIDIDAE) IN CANADA
- 1 December 1994
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Canadian Entomologist
- Vol. 126 (6) , 1459-1491
- https://doi.org/10.4039/ent1261459-6
Abstract
In Canada biological control of grasshoppers has been studied since the 1930s. Previous attempts at "classical" introductions have not been successful. Native parasitoids, especially sarcophagid flies, have a significant impact on grasshopper populations during certain times but the required conditions and regulatory potential are not understood. Sarcophagids, especially Kellymyia kellyi (Aldrich), and the mermithid nematodes Agamermis decaudate Cobb, Steiner, and Christie and Mermis subnigricans Cobb have some potential as inundative agents. Invertebrate predators appear to impact on egg and early-instar nymphal grasshoppers, and vertebrates, especially birds, help to regulate later instars and adults. The role of microbial pathogens in the population dynamics of grasshoppers in western Canada has long been recognized, particularly with regard to entomophthoran fungi. The possibility of utilizing the microsporidan Nosema locustae Canning for suppression of grasshopper populations has been postulated since the 1970s and field evaluations of its potential have been conducted in Saskatchewan and Alberta. More recently, considerable work, both basic and applied, has demonstrated the potential of various fungus isolates pathogenic to grasshoppers as both "classical" and inundative control agents. Entomopoxvirus isolates from grasshoppers also show potential as biological control agents of grasshoppers but this potential has yet to be investigated in field situations. It is clear, however, that no single microbial pathogen will be the panacea of grasshopper control. It is suggested that future biological control research focus on acquiring a better understanding of the requirements and quantitative effects of parasitoids and predators on grasshopper populations. Emphasis should also be placed on developing integrated pest management programs that utilize local natural enemies (nematodes and microorganisms) for inundative control during outbreaks.Keywords
This publication has 103 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE NEARCTIC SPECIES OFDUTANIXON (HYMENOPTERA: SCELIONIDAE), EGG PARASITOIDS OF GROUND CRICKETS (ORTHOPTERA: GRYLLIDAE)The Canadian Entomologist, 1991
- EFFECT OF TWO INSECT VIRUSES AND TWO ENTOMOPATHOGENIC FUNGI ON LARVAL AND PUPAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE ALFALFA LEAFCUTTING BEE, MEGACHILE ROTUNDATA (FAB.) (HYMENOPTERA: MEGACHILIDAE)The Canadian Entomologist, 1990
- Predation on grasshoppers by spiders in sand dune grasslandsEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 1989
- Hemocytic defense response to the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana in the migratory grasshopper Melanoplus sanguinipesEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 1987
- Host–parasite genome relationships in Acridid grasshoppers. I. Variation in the isoenzymes of the Caledia captiva species complex and in the gut bacterium Enterobacter cloacaeGenome, 1987
- Pathological effects of the parasite Malameba locustae in males of the migratory grasshopper Melanoplus sanguinipes and its interaction with the insecticide, CypermethrinEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 1986
- Natural and Applied Control of Insects by ProtozoaAnnual Review of Entomology, 1981
- ASSESSMENT OF LOSS IN YIELD OF WHEAT CAUSED BY THE MIGRATORY GRASSHOPPER, MELANOPLUS SANGUINIPES (ORTHOPTERA: ACRIDIDAE)The Canadian Entomologist, 1974
- A REVIEW OF THE INSECT ENEMIES OF ACRIDOIDEA (ORTHOPTERA)Ecological Entomology, 1963
- Observations on Internal Parasites (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) of Eggs of Pest Grasshopper Species in the Prairie Provinces of CanadaThe Canadian Entomologist, 1953