Is esophagoscopy alone sufficient for patients with reflux symptoms?
- 1 March 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
- Vol. 59 (3) , 349-354
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(03)02714-7
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- A prospective, blinded study of diagnostic esophagoscopy with a superthin, stand-alone, battery-powered esophagoscopeAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology, 2003
- Accuracy of esophagoscopy performed by a non-physician endoscopist with a 4-mm diameter battery-powered endoscopeGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2003
- Cost-effectiveness of screening a population with chronic gastroesophageal refluxGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2003
- Accuracy of a narrow-diameter battery-powered endoscope in sedated and unsedated patientsGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2002
- Accuracy of endoscopic databases for assessing patient symptoms: comparison with self-reported questionnaires in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virusGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2000
- Unsedated small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus conventional EGD: A comparative studyGastroenterology, 1999
- Prospective evaluation of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy: feasibility and study on performance and toleranceGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1999
- A comparison of transnasal and transoral endoscopy with small-diameter endoscopes in unsedated patientsGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1999
- Unsedated Peroral Endoscopy With a Video Ultrathin Endoscope: Patient Acceptance, Tolerance, and Diagnostic AccuracyAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology, 1998
- Peroral ultrathin endoscopy in adult patientsGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1997