"Going Monoclonal": Art, Science, and Magic in the Day-to-Day Use of Hybridoma Technology
- 1 June 1988
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Social Problems
- Vol. 35 (3) , 244-260
- https://doi.org/10.2307/800621
Abstract
Recent work in the sociology of science has highlighted the local and tacit dimensions of scientific work. Against the widely held assumption that we are here dealing with a form of knowledge largely beyond the control and manipulation of scientists, we will argue that the unsaid is indeed a part of conscious scientific practice—and hence subject to negotiation, discussion, and construction. Based on a study of the transmission of hybridoma technology, this paper will show that questions of local knowledge, tacit knowledge, and “magic,” far from being ignored by scientific researchers, are explicitly a part of their daily practice. It will be seen that these questions give rise to a series of social and technical distinctions which are constitutive of scientific work.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The production of more useful monoclonal antibodies I. Modifications of the basic technologyImmunology Today, 1986
- Confronting NaturePublished by Springer Nature ,1986
- On the emergence of commercial products from biotechnologyTrends in Biotechnology, 1985
- Improved fusion methods. IV. Technical aspectsJournal of Immunological Methods, 1985
- Monoclonal Antibody Strategy and TechniquesPublished by Springer Nature ,1985
- Technological Knowledge without Science: The Innovation of Flush Riveting in American Airplanes, ca. 1930-ca. 1950Technology and Culture, 1984
- A jungle full of pitfallsImmunology Today, 1984
- DIVISION OF LABOUR AND DISTRIBUTION OF TACIT KNOWLEDGE IN THE AUTOMATION OF METAL MACHININGPublished by Elsevier ,1984
- Qualifications tacites, division du travail et nouvelles technologiesSociologie du Travail, 1984
- Production of monoclonal antibodies: Strategy and tacticsJournal of Immunological Methods, 1980