Meropenem dosing in critically ill patients with sepsis and without renal dysfunction: intermittent bolus versus continuous administration? Monte Carlo dosing simulations and subcutaneous tissue distribution
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 27 April 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
- Vol. 64 (1) , 142-150
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkp139
Abstract
To compare the plasma and subcutaneous tissue concentration–time profiles of meropenem administered by intermittent bolus dosing or continuous infusion to critically ill patients with sepsis and without renal dysfunction, and to use population pharmacokinetic modelling and Monte Carlo simulations to assess the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) against Gram-negative pathogens likely to be encountered in critical care units. We randomized 10 patients with sepsis to receive meropenem by intermittent bolus administration (n = 5; 1 g 8 hourly) or an equal dose administered by continuous infusion (n = 5). Serial subcutaneous tissue concentrations were determined using microdialysis and compared with plasma data for first-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetics. Population pharmacokinetic modelling of plasma data and Monte Carlo simulations were then undertaken with NONMEM®. It was found that continuous infusion maintains higher median trough concentrations, in both plasma (intermittent bolus 0 versus infusion 7 mg/L) and subcutaneous tissue (0 versus 4 mg/L). All simulated intermittent bolus, extended and continuous infusion dosing achieved 100% of pharmacodynamic targets against most Gram-negative pathogens. Superior obtainment of pharmacodynamic targets was achieved using administration by extended or continuous infusion against less susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species. This is the first study to compare the relative concentration–time data of bolus and continuous administration of meropenem at the subcutaneous tissue and plasma levels. We found that the administration of meropenem by continuous infusion maintains higher concentrations in subcutaneous tissue and plasma than by intermittent bolus dosing. Administration by extended or continuous infusion will achieve superior CFR against less-susceptible organisms in patients without renal dysfunction.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Piperacillin penetration into tissue of critically ill patients with sepsis—Bolus versus continuous administration?Critical Care Medicine, 2009
- Continuous infusion of β-lactam antibiotics in severe infections: a review of its roleInternational Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 2007
- Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock*Critical Care Medicine, 2006
- Standardization of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) terminology for anti-infective drugs: an updateJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2005
- Antimicrobial pharmacodynamics: critical interactions of 'bug and drug'Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2004
- Impact of adequate empirical antibiotic therapy on the outcome of patients admitted to the intensive care unit with sepsis*Critical Care Medicine, 2003
- Pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime in serum and peritoneal exudate during continuous versus intermittent administration to patients with severe intra-abdominal infectionsJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2002
- Impaired target site penetration of β -lactams may account for therapeutic failure in patients with septic shockCritical Care Medicine, 2001
- Inadequate Antimicrobial Treatment of InfectionsChest, 1999
- Pharmacokinetics of antibiotics in natural and experimental superficial compartments in animals and humansJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 1993