Effects of Performance Information and Physical Attractiveness on Managerial Decisions about Promotion
- 1 December 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Social Psychology
- Vol. 128 (6) , 791-801
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1988.9924557
Abstract
We investigated the impact of physical attractiveness and work performance on promotion decisions. Executives (= 61) from a variety of firms in Hong Kong evaluated six candidates for promotion. These candidate were of high, medium, or low attractiveness and were described as showing either high or mediocre work performance. The executives used performance as the major criterion to decide which candidate should be promoted. Physical attractiveness enhanced the likelihood of promotion only when the candidates' performance was mediocre. A similar pattern of results was also found for the person perception items measuring the candidates' competence and likeability. Physical attractiveness had a significant impact on candidates' perceived competence and likeability only when their performance level was mediocre. These results were interpreted in light of a hierarchical model of personnel decisions based on Tversky's (1972) elimination by aspect model of decision making.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- When beauty is beastly: The effects of appearance and sex on evaluations of job applicants for managerial and nonmanagerial jobsPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- EFFECTS OF CANDIDATE CHARACTERISTICS ON MANAGEMENT PROMOTION DECISIONS: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDYPersonnel Psychology, 1983
- Physical Attractiveness and Expectations of SuccessPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1981
- Physical AttractivenessPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1981
- Sex and physical attractiveness of raters and applicants as determinants of resumé evaluations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977
- Physical Attractiveness and AssertivenessThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1975
- Relative importance of applicant sex, attractiveness, and scholastic standing in evaluation of job applicant resumes.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975
- Beauty is talent: Task evaluation as a function of the performer's physical attractiveness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974
- What is beautiful is good.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972
- Selection interview decisions: The relative influence of appearance and factual written information on an interviewer's final rating.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1967