Etoposide (E) + epirebicin (E) + cisplatin (P) combination chemotherapy (EEP) In advanced gastric cancer: Negative impact on clinical outcome
- 1 December 1992
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Oncology
- Vol. 3 (10) , 861-863
- https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058113
Abstract
One hundred nineteen patients with advanced gastric cancer were included in a study comparing EEP vs. FEM chemotherapy. The response rate was higher (30%) in patients on EEP than in those treated with FEM (p = 0.05). Severe leukopenia, anemia, alopecia and infection were significantly more frequent on EEP. In addition, because of its intrinsic toxicity, EEP chemotherapy has a negative impact on the performance status of patients treated with this regimen, more than half of whom presented at least one episode of severe symptomatic toxcity while on EEP chemotherapy. The median time to progression and median survival for EEP-FEM were 2.08–3.4 and 4.2–7.9 months, respectively. Our data do not support the use of EEP chemotherapy in patients with AGC.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- MMAF for advanced gastric cancerEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1991
- Sequential high-dose methotrexate and fluorouracil combined with doxorubicin--a step ahead in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer: a trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cooperative Group.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1991
- Phase II Trial of Etoposide, Doxorubicin (Adriamycin), and Cisplatin (EAP Regimen) in Advanced Gastric CancerAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1990
- Reporting results of cancer treatmentCancer, 1981
- 5-Fluorouracil, Doxorubicin, and Mitomycin (FAM) Combination Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric CancerAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1980