Concurrence between subject and proxy ratings of quality of life for people with and without intellectual disabilities
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability
- Vol. 25 (1) , 19-39
- https://doi.org/10.1080/132697800112767
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Second Approximation to an International Standard for Life SatisfactionSocial Indicators Research, 1998
- The discriminate validity of the Lifestyle Satisfaction Scale (LSS) for the assessment of Australian adults with intellectual disabilitiesJournal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 1996
- Deinstitutionalization in the UK and Ireland: Outcomes for service usersJournal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 1996
- On the trail of the gold standard for subjective well-beingSocial Indicators Research, 1995
- Validity Studies the Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale (Comqol): Instrument Development and Psychometric Evaluation on College Staff and StudentsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1994
- Proxy Respondents and the Validity of Occupational and Other Exposure DataAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1992
- General serviceplans: An evaluation of their content within two service delivery systemsAustralia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 1991
- Residential satisfaction of persons with an intellectual disability living in an institution or in the communityAustralia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 1991
- Using Proxies to Evaluate Quality of LifeMedical Care, 1989
- Psychological Impairment and Psychological Health in the Psychological Well-Being of the Physically IllPsychosomatic Medicine, 1980