Comparison of an Active and Passive Surveillance System of Primary Care Providers for Hepatitis, Measles, Rubella, and Salmonellosis in Vermont
- 1 July 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Public Health Association in American Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 73 (7) , 795-797
- https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.73.7.795
Abstract
Between June 1, 1980 and May 31, 1981, the Vermont Health Department telephoned a randomly chosen half of the state''s primary care offices for surveillance reports of hepatitis, measles, rubella and salmonellosis. No reports were actively solicited from the other half of the primary-care practices in the state. Active-surveillance units made more reports and more complete reports of diseases and had twice the number of reports per patient seen by the practice than did passive-surveillance units.This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Shigella surveillance in a large metropolitan area: assessment of a passive reporting system.American Journal of Public Health, 1980
- A comparison of national infection and immunization estimates for measles and rubella.American Journal of Public Health, 1978
- Surveillance and the primary care physicianPostgraduate Medicine, 1977
- INTENSIVE HEPATITIS SURVEILLANCE IN MINNESOTA: METHODS AND RESULTSAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1977
- Salmonellosis in the United States, 1968-1974The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1976
- Importance of disease surveillancePreventive Medicine, 1974
- Viral hepatitis in Israel: the effect of canvassing physicians on notifications and the apparent epidemiological pattern.1972
- A community surveillance system of infectious diseases in the greater Atlanta area.American Journal of Public Health and the Nations Health, 1966
- The Surveillance of Communicable Diseases of National ImportanceNew England Journal of Medicine, 1963
- Usefulness of communicable disease reports.1952