Genetic differences in learning behavior in honeybees (Apis mellifera capensis)
- 1 May 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Behavior Genetics
- Vol. 21 (3) , 271-294
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01065820
Abstract
Workers from colonies of Cape honeybees show marked phenotypic differences in performance in proboscis extension reflex (PER) conditioning. Analysis of these differences using parthenogenetic offspring groups permitted the estimation of genotypic values and revealed a high degree of genetic variability that is evident among related as well as unrelated bees. The results obtained from related groups are of particular importance, since they demonstrated the existence of strong genetic variability among individuals of the same colony. Quantitative analysis yielded high estimates of additive genetic effects and low estimates of dominance effects. Selection of individual workers resulted in an explicit increase in genetic variance of the next generation (G1). However, selection of bees from the parthenogenetic G1 generation, which was done to obtain parthenogenetic G2 offspring, did not lead to further improvement in selection. This observation suggests that recombination of linked genes underlying proboscis extension reflex was neglible during selection in parthenogenetic groups. Taken together with further behavioral analysis (Brandes and Menzel, 1990; Brandes et al., 1988), results from these quantitative genetic experiments suggest that additive genetic factors contribute significantly to variability among individuals for associative learning.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Common mechanisms in proboscis extension conditioning and visual learning revealed by genetic selection in honeybees (Apis mellifera capensis)Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 1990
- Colony performance in honeybees (Apis mellifera capensis Esch.) depends on the proportion of subordinate and dominant workersBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 1989
- Time-course of memory formation differs in honey bee lines selected for good and poor learningAnimal Behaviour, 1988
- A genetic component to division of labour within honey bee coloniesNature, 1988
- Genotypic variability in age polyethism and task specialization in the honey bee, Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae)Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 1988
- Estimation of heritability of learning behavior in honeybees (Apis mellifera capensis)Behavior Genetics, 1988
- Genetic pollution and number of matings in a black honey bee (Apis mellifera mellifera) populationTheoretical and Applied Genetics, 1986
- Classical conditioning of proboscis extension in honeybees (Apis mellifera).Journal of Comparative Psychology, 1983
- The Laying Worker in the Cape Honeybee,Apis Mellifera CapensisJournal of Apicultural Research, 1963
- Ein Beitrag zur Frage der Arbeitsteilung im BienenstaatJournal of Comparative Physiology A, 1952