SELF‐MONITORING OF ATTENTIONAL BEHAVIOR VERSUS SELF‐MONITORING OF PRODUCTIVITY: EFFECTS ON ON‐TASK BEHAVIOR AND ACADEMIC RESPONSE RATE AMONG LEARNING DISABLED CHILDREN
- 1 December 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
- Vol. 19 (4) , 417-423
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1986.19-417
Abstract
I investigated the differential effects of self-monitoring of attentional behavior and self-monitoring of productivity on on-task behavior and academic response rate. Subjects were four learning disabled children with significant attentional problems. Results indicated relatively equivalent increases in on-task behavior over baseline during all treatment phases. Academic response rate also improved under both interventions, with self-monitoring of productivity showing a superior effect for one subject, an equivalent effect for one subject, and less dear results for two subjects.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does research on self-control need more control?Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 1984
- Instructional ecology and academic responding time for students at three levels of teacher-perceived behavioral competenceJournal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1983
- Effective Spelling InstructionThe Elementary School Journal, 1983
- The Future of Behavior Analysis in the Schools? Consider Its Recent Past, and Then Ask a Different QuestionSchool Psychology Review, 1981
- Theoretical Explanations for Reactivity in Self-MonitoringBehavior Modification, 1981
- APPLICATIONS OF SELF‐CONTROL PROCEDURES BY CHILDREN: A REVIEWJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1979