Self-Reported Reasons Men Decide Not to Participate in Free Prostate Cancer Screening
- 1 January 2003
- journal article
- Published by Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) in Oncology Nursing Forum
- Vol. 30 (1) , E12-E16
- https://doi.org/10.1188/03.onf.e12-e16
Abstract
To determine the reasons why men fail to participate in a free prostate cancer screening. Survey and secondary analyses using correlational design. Community sites in the Southeastern United States. The sample (N = 241) ranged in age from 40-68 years. Mean age was 50 years (SD = 7.4). Most of the men were African American (79%) and married (70%). Almost half of the subjects (44%) earned between $9,601 and $25,020 per year. Telephone survey of men who did not participate in initial prostate cancer screening after educational program. Demographics, self-reported reasons men decided not to participate in a free screening following a prostate cancer educational program, and predictors for subsequent participation in screening. The main self-reported reason for not participating in a free prostate cancer screening opportunity was time problems. A significant relationship between income and physician problems existed among the men who did not participate. Twenty-one percent of the 241 men participated in a second opportunity for free prostate cancer screening. Men who cited "lost packet" as their reason for not participating in the first free screening were more than twice as likely to go for the second opportunity for free screening when offered another packet or voucher for a free screening with their physician of choice. "Time problems" was the most frequent self-reported reason men gave for failure to participate. Providing a follow-up phone call and vouchers a second time for reimbursement of the cost associated with a screening increased participation. Men often need assistance with locating physicians and nurse practitioners who will file for financial reimbursement. Appointment reminders are critical. The findings of this study of the significant relationship between income and "physician problems" for not participating has implications for healthcare providers. Future programs could provide telephone follow-up with men and remail vouchers, as needed. In addition, men could be encouraged to designate one place in their households for health-related papers (for safekeeping).Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cancer Statistics, 2002CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2002
- Comment re: Screening and early treatment of prostate cancer are accumulating strong evidence and supportThe Prostate, 2000
- African-American men and intention to adhere to recommended follow-up for an abnormal prostate cancer early detection examination resultUrology, 2000
- Screening and early hormonal treatment of prostate cancer are accumulating strong evidence and supportThe Prostate, 2000
- Cancer Surveillance Series: Interpreting Trends in Prostate Cancer Part II: Cause of Death Misclassification and the Recent Rise and Fall in Prostate Cancer MortalityJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1999
- Cancer Surveillance Series: Interpreting Trends in Prostate Cancer Part III: Quantifying the Link Between Population Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing and Recent Declines in Prostate Cancer MortalityJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1999
- The National Cancer Data Base report on prostate carcinoma after the peak in incidence rates in the U. S.Cancer, 1998
- Status report on prostate cancer in African Americans: a national blueprint for action.CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1998
- Knowledge, beliefs, and prior screening behavior among blacks and whites reporting for prostate cancer screeningUrology, 1995
- A successful recruitment process of African American men for early detection of prostate cancerCancer, 1995