Magnetic resonance venography for the detection of deep venous thrombosis: Comparison with contrast venography and duplex Doppler ultrasonography
- 1 November 1993
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Vascular Surgery
- Vol. 18 (5) , 734-741
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0741-5214(93)90325-g
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Deep venous thrombosis: is contrast venography still the diagnostic "gold standard"?Radiology, 1988
- Contrast venography of the leg: diagnostic efficacy, tolerance, and complication rates with ionic and nonionic contrast media.Radiology, 1987
- Contrast agent-induced thrombophlebitis following leg phlebography: meglumine loxaglate versus meglumine lothalamate.Radiology, 1983
- Impact of venography on the diagnosis and management of deep vein thrombosis.BMJ, 1983
- Postphlebographic thrombosis: a double-blind study with methylglucamine metrizoate and metrizamide.Radiology, 1981
- Observer variation in the interpretation of lower limb venogramsAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1979
- The Heparin Flush: An Aid in Preventing Post-Venography ThrombophlebitisRadiology, 1979
- Skin Necrosis following Extravasation during Peripheral PhlebographyRadiology, 1977
- Leg Phlebography: The Incidence, Nature and Modification of Undesirable Side EffectsRadiology, 1977
- The appearances of artefacts on lower limb phlebogramsClinical Radiology, 1975