Contrast agent-induced thrombophlebitis following leg phlebography: meglumine loxaglate versus meglumine lothalamate.
- 1 May 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 147 (2) , 399-400
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.147.2.6340158
Abstract
A comparison was made of the incidence of venous thrombophlebitis resulting from the use of a high-osmolality contrast medium (Conray 60%, meglumine ioxaglate) and a low-osmolality contrast medium (Hexabrix 59%, meglumine iothalamate). In 30 patients with varicose veins, Conray was injected into 1 leg and Hexabrix into the other. The incidence of thrombophlebitis was then determined using the 125I fibrinogen uptake test in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. There was significantly less thrombophlebitis with Hexabrix than with Conray. Evidently, Hexabrix is safer for phlebography. Hexabrix is also stable in solution.This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit: