Modelling module evaluation in marketing education
- 1 March 1999
- journal article
- case report
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Quality Assurance in Education
- Vol. 7 (1) , 41-46
- https://doi.org/10.1108/09684889910252531
Abstract
Quality assurance in higher education has been a subject of much interest and debate among academics, management of higher educational institutions, and the funding bodies, for some time now. Almost every higher educational institution has adopted some form of student evaluation mechanism as a part of this drive for quality assurance. This paper argues that evaluation systems existing in many institutions are not specific enough to provide useful guidelines for staff and management to improve on their provision. Many evaluation systems the authors have come across are too general, being institution‐wide, standard questionnaires which fail to provide much insight into how students evaluate instructor‐related factors and module‐specific factors. Under these circumstances, the objective of this paper is to present a model of instructor and module evaluation as a guideline for the development of more focused student evaluations within the context of marketing education.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Increasing the Effectiveness of Student Evaluation of Instructor Data through a Factor Score Comparative ReportDecision Sciences, 1993
- Viewpoint: Student Evaluation of InstructionJournal of European Industrial Training, 1989
- The Propensity of College Students to Modify Course Expectations and its Impact on Course Performance InformationJournal of Marketing Education, 1987
- Marketing Higher Education: Benefits and Risks for the American Academic SystemThe Journal of Higher Education, 1980
- An Analysis of Students' Satisfaction with Their Academic ProgramThe Journal of Higher Education, 1977
- Consumer Dissatisfaction: The Effect of Disconfirmed Expectancy on Perceived Product PerformanceJournal of Marketing Research, 1973
- Bringing the Concept of Marketing to Higher EducationThe Journal of Higher Education, 1972