The Contribution of Diagnostic Substitution to the Growing Administrative Prevalence of Autism in US Special Education
Top Cited Papers
- 1 April 2006
- journal article
- Published by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Vol. 117 (4) , 1028-1037
- https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2005-1516
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. Growing administrative prevalence of autism has stirred public controversy and concern. The extent to which increases in the administrative prevalence of autism have been associated with corresponding decreases in the use of other diagnostic categories is unknown. The main objective of this study was to examine the relationship between the rising administrative prevalence of autism in US special education and changes in the use of other classification categories. METHODS. The main outcome measure was the administrative prevalence of autism among children ages 6 to 11 in US special education. Analysis involved estimating multilevel regression models of time-series data on the prevalence of disabilities among children in US special education from 1984 to 2003. RESULTS. The average administrative prevalence of autism among children increased from 0.6 to 3.1 per 1000 from 1994 to 2003. By 2003, only 17 states had a special education prevalence of autism that was within the range of recent epidemiological estimates. During the same period, the prevalence of mental retardation and learning disabilities declined by 2.8 and 8.3 per 1000, respectively. Higher autism prevalence was significantly associated with corresponding declines in the prevalence of mental retardation and learning disabilities. The declining prevalence of mental retardation and learning disabilities from 1994 to 2003 represented a significant downward deflection in their preexisting trajectories of prevalence from 1984 to 1993. California was one of a handful of states that did not clearly follow this pattern. CONCLUSIONS. Prevalence findings from special education data do not support the claim of an autism epidemic because the administrative prevalence figures for most states are well below epidemiological estimates. The growing administrative prevalence of autism from 1994 to 2003 was associated with corresponding declines in the usage of other diagnostic categories.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- US Department of Education Data on “Autism” Are Not Reliable for Tracking Autism PrevalencePediatrics, 2005
- Three Reasons Not to Believe in an Autism EpidemicCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 2005
- National Autism Prevalence Trends From United States Special Education DataPediatrics, 2005
- No effect of MMR withdrawal on the incidence of autism: a total population studyJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2005
- School District Resources and Identification of Children With Autistic DisorderAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2005
- Incidence of autism spectrum disorders: Changes over time and their meaning*Acta Paediatrica, 2005
- A Population-Based Study of Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Vaccination and AutismNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- The epidemiology of autistic spectrum disorders: is the prevalence rising?Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 2002
- Congressional Autism Hearings ContinuePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,2001
- Discrepancy Between Definitions of Learning Disabilities and School PracticesJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1998