Does Greater Firm‐Specific Return Variation Mean More or Less Informed Stock Pricing?
Top Cited Papers
- 14 November 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Accounting Research
- Vol. 41 (5) , 797-836
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-679x.2003.00124.x
Abstract
Roll [1988] observes low R2 statistics for common asset pricing models due to vigorous firm‐specific return variation not associated with public information. He concludes that this implies “either private information or else occasional frenzy unrelated to concrete information”[p. 56]. We show that firms and industries with lower market model R2 statistics exhibit higher association between current returns and future earnings, indicating more information about future earnings in current stock returns. This supports Roll's first interpretation: higher firm‐specific return variation as a fraction of total variation signals more information‐laden stock prices and, therefore, more efficient stock markets.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Have Individual Stocks Become More Volatile? An Empirical Exploration of Idiosyncratic RiskThe Journal of Finance, 2001
- The information content of stock markets: why do emerging markets have synchronous stock price movements?Journal of Financial Economics, 2000
- Financial markets and the allocation of capitalJournal of Financial Economics, 2000
- The Sensitivity of Corporate Governance Systems to the Timeliness of Accounting EarningsSSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
- The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings1Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1997
- Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation*Contemporary Accounting Research, 1995
- Stock return variation and expected dividendsJournal of Financial Economics, 1992
- An analysis of intertemporal and cross-sectional determinants of earnings response coefficientsJournal of Accounting and Economics, 1989
- Dividend Innovations and Stock Price VolatilityEconometrica, 1988
- NoiseThe Journal of Finance, 1986