Three Methods for Sampling Arthropod Numbers on California Cotton
- 1 June 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Environmental Entomology
- Vol. 11 (3) , 565-572
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/11.3.565
Abstract
Three collection methods were compared as measures of pest and beneficial arthropod numbers in cotton: a visual examination of plants, a modified berlese-funnel method, and whole-plant collection in cloth bags. Numbers of arthropods collected by the three methods were compared, with developmental stages separated where possible. No significant differences in the numbers collected by the three methods were detected when arthropod populations were at low densities. No single method was most effective for estimating all life stages of two or more particular arthropod species. A combination of the bag and berlese-funnel methods provided a better estimate for some arthropod populations than the use of bags alone. Some of these methods are suitable for research purposes, but none are feasible for use by commercial pest control advisors.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cotton Arthropod Food Chain Disruptions by Pesticides in the San Joaquin Valley, California 1Environmental Entomology, 1978
- The Longevity and Fecundity of Orius tristicolor1 When Introduced to Increasing Numbers of the Prey 2Frankliniella occidentalis35Environmental Entomology, 1978
- A Comparison of Vacuum and Whole-Plant Methods for Sampling Predaceous Arthropods on CottonEnvironmental Entomology, 1977
- Field Cage Evaluation of Predators for Control of Lygus hesperus Knight on CottonEnvironmental Entomology, 1976
- A Comparison of Techniques for Sampling Beneficial Arthropod Populations Associated with Cotton 1 , 2Environmental Entomology, 1976
- Consumption by Several Common Arthropod Predators of Eggs and Larvae of Two Heliothis Species1 That Attack Cotton23Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 1968
- An Improved Backpack Motor Fan for Suction Sampling of Insect Populations1Journal of Economic Entomology, 1961