A randomized comparison of vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical priming in nulliparous women before operative hysteroscopy
- 31 October 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Fertility and Sterility
- Vol. 86 (4) , 990-994
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.03.039
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- A randomised controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal gel for inducing labour at termBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2005
- Oral misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for induction of laborInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2005
- Influence of misoprostol or prostaglandin E2 for induction of labor on the incidence of pathological CTG tracing: a randomized trialEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2004
- A randomized trial that compared intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal insert in pregnancies at high risk of fetal distressAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
- Dinoprostone versus misoprostol: a randomized study of nulliparous women undergoing induction of laborActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2003
- Experience with 800 hysteroscopic endometrial ablationsThe Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, 1996
- Complications of hysteroscopy—Their cause, prevention, and correctionThe Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, 1995
- Uterine Perforation Associated with Endometrial AblationAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1992