A randomized trial that compared intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal insert in pregnancies at high risk of fetal distress
Open Access
- 1 July 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 191 (1) , 247-253
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2003.12.038
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic reviewBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1999
- Misoprostol is more efficacious for labor induction than prostaglandin E2 , but is it associated with more risk?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1999
- Labor induction with prostaglandin E1 misoprostol compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: A randomized trialObstetrics & Gynecology, 1998
- A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor inductionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1997
- A randomized comparison between misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with unfavorable cervicesObstetrics & Gynecology, 1997
- Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: A meta-analysisObstetrics & Gynecology, 1997
- A comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening and labor inductionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- Misoprostol: An effective agent for cervical ripening and labor inductionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- Prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening and induction of labor: A critical analysisAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989
- Induction and Augmentation of LaborObstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 1988