Preoperative Shower Revisited: Can High Topical Antiseptic Levels Be Achieved on the Skin Surface Before Surgical Admission?
- 1 August 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Vol. 207 (2) , 233-239
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.12.054
Abstract
Skin asepsis is a sentinel strategy for reducing risk of surgical site infections. In this study, chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) skin concentrations were determined after preoperative showering/skin cleansing using 4% CHG soap or 2% CHG-impregnated polyester cloth. Subjects were randomized to one of three shower (4% soap)/skin cleansing (2% cloth) groups (n = 20 per group): (group 1 A/B) evening, (group 2 A/B) morning, or (group 3 A/B) evening and morning. After showering or skin cleansing, volunteers returned to the investigator's laboratory where CHG skin surface concentrations were determined at five separate skin sites. CHG concentrations were compared with CHG minimal inhibitory concentration that inhibits 90% (MIC(90)) of staphylococcal skin isolates. CHG MIC(90) for 61 skin isolates was 4.8 parts per million (ppm). In group 1A, 4% CHG skin concentrations ranged from 17.2 to 31.6 ppm, and CHG concentrations were 361.5 to 589.5 ppm (p < 0.0001) in group 1B (2%). In group 2A (4%), CHG levels ranged from 51.6 to 119.6 ppm and 848.1 to 1,049.6 ppm in group 2B (2%), respectively (p < 0.0001). CHG levels ranged from 101.4 to 149.4 ppm in the 4% CHG group (group 3A) compared with 1,484.6 to 2,031.3 ppm in 2% CHG cloth (group 3B) group (p < 0.0001). Effective CHG levels were not detected in the 4% CHG group in selected sites in seven (35%) subjects in group 1A, three (15%) in group 2A, and five (25%) in group 3A. Effective CHG levels were achieved on most skin sites after using 4% CHG; gaps in antiseptic coverage were noted at selective sites even after repeated application. Use of the 2% CHG polyester cloth resulted in considerably higher skin concentrations with no gaps in antiseptic coverage. Effective decolonization of the skin before hospital admission can play an important role in reducing risk of surgical site infections.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does Preoperative Topical Antimicrobial Scrub Reduce Positive Surgical Site Culture Rates in Men Undergoing Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement?Journal of Urology, 2007
- Comparative of a new and innovative 2% chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated cloth with 4% chlorhexidine gluconate as topical antiseptic for preparation of the skin prior to surgeryAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2007
- Significant pathogens isolated from surgical site infections at a community hospital in the MidwestAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2006
- Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on orthopaedic wardsThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2006
- In‐use efficacy of a chlorhexidine in alcohol surgical rub: a comparative studyAnz Journal of Surgery, 2004
- Cost and morbidity of MRSA in head and neck cancer patients: what are the consequences?The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 2004
- Cost–Benefit Analysis of Chlorhexidine Gluconate Dressing in the Prevention of Catheter-Related Bloodstream InfectionsInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2004
- A systems approach to preoperative surgical patient skin preparationAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2004
- Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999American Journal of Infection Control, 1999
- Comparative antibacterial efficacy of a 2-minute surgical scrub with chlorhexidine gluconate, povidone-iodine, and chloroxylenol sponge-brushesAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 1988