Effectiveness of St John's Wort in Major Depression
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 18 April 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 285 (15) , 1978-1986
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.15.1978
Abstract
Context Extracts of St John's wort are widely used to treat depression. Although more than 2 dozen clinical trials have been conducted with St John's wort, most have significant flaws in design and do not enable meaningful interpretation. Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of a standardized extract of St John's wort with placebo in outpatients with major depression. Design and Setting Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial conducted between November 1998 and January 2000 in 11 academic medical centers in the United States. Participants Two hundred adult outpatients (mean age, 42.4 years; 67.0% female; 85.9% white) diagnosed as having major depression and having a baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score of at least 20. Intervention Participants completed a 1-week, single-blind run-in of placebo, then were randomly assigned to receive either St John's wort extract (n = 98; 900 mg/d for 4 weeks, increased to 1200 mg/d in the absence of an adequate response thereafter) or placebo (n = 102) for 8 weeks. Main Outcome Measures The primary outcome measure was rate of change on the HAM-D over the treatment period. Secondary measures included the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A), the Global Assessment of Function (GAF) scale, and the Clinical Global Impression–Severity and –Improvement scales (CGI-S and CGI-I). Results The random coefficient analyses for the HAM-D, HAM-A, CGI-S, and CGI-I all showed significant effects for time but not for treatment or time-by-treatment interaction (for HAM-D scores, P<.001, P = .16, and P = .58, respectively). Analysis of covariance showed nonsignificant effects for BDI and GAF scores. The proportion of participants achieving an a priori definition of response did not differ between groups. The number reaching remission of illness was significantly higher with St John's wort than with placebo (P = .02), but the rates were very low in the full intention-to-treat analysis (14/98 [14.3%] vs 5/102 [4.9%], respectively). St John's wort was safe and well tolerated. Headache was the only adverse event that occurred with greater frequency with St John's wort than placebo (39/95 [41%] vs 25/100 [25%], respectively). Conclusion In this study, St John's wort was not effective for treatment of major depression.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Helsinki Discord? A Controversial DeclarationJAMA, 2000
- Perspectives on the Fifth Revision of the Declaration of HelsinkiJAMA, 2000
- Comparison of an extract of hypericum (LI 160) and sertraline in the treatment of depression: A double-blind, randomized pilot studyClinical Therapeutics, 2000
- Placebos, Drug Effects, and Study Design: A Clinician’s GuideAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1999
- Threats to the Validity of Clinical Trials Employing Enrichment Strategies for Sample SelectionControlled Clinical Trials, 1998
- Effectiveness and Tolerance of the Hypericum Extract LI 160 in Comparison with Imipramine: Randomized Double-Blind Study with 135 OutpatientsJournal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 1994
- Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Study Examining the Effectiveness of an Hypericum Preparation in 105 Mildly Depressed PatientsJournal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 1994
- Multicenter Double-Blind Study Examining the Antidepressant Effectiveness of the Hypericum Extract LI 160Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 1994
- Hypericum Treatment of Mild Depressions with Somatic SymptomsJournal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 1994
- A Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating ScaleArchives of General Psychiatry, 1988