Wrongdoing by Consultants: An Examination of Employees? Reporting Intentions
- 1 March 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Business Ethics
- Vol. 57 (2) , 121-137
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-4600-0
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- INTEGRATING TRENDS IN WHISTLE BLOWING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: PROMOTING ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS, SOCIETAL RESPONSIBILITY, AND EMPLOYEE EMPOWERMENTAmerican Business Law Journal, 2002
- What Makes Whistle-Blowers Effective? Three Field StudiesHuman Relations, 2002
- The Effects of Interpersonal Closeness and Issue Seriousness on Blowing the WhistleInternational Journal of Business Communication, 1997
- A Better Statutory Approach to Whistle-blowingBusiness Ethics Quarterly, 1997
- Effective-Whistle BlowingAcademy of Management Review, 1995
- Effective Whistle-BlowingAcademy of Management Review, 1995
- Organizational Commitment and Whistle-BlowingGroup & Organization Management, 1994
- Potential Predictors of Whistle-Blowing: A Prosocial Behavior PerspectiveAcademy of Management Review, 1985
- CHARACTERISTICS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CLIMATE AND PERCEIVED WRONGDOING ASSOCIATED WITH WHISTLE‐BLOWING DECISIONSPersonnel Psychology, 1985
- Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structureJournal of Financial Economics, 1976