Effects of a new commitment law on involuntary admissions and service utilization patterns.
- 1 September 1979
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Law and Human Behavior
- Vol. 3 (3) , 149-161
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01039788
Abstract
Recently Nebraska changed its commitment law to include many procedural safeguards and require behaviorally manifested dangerousness as a criterion of commitment. An interrupted time-series design was used to determine what effects the new law had on admission characteristics and service utilization patterns of all those committed to Nebraska's three state hospitals. An immediate drop in involuntary admissions was found, but this decline was temporary. Several changes in the demographic characteristics of those committed were also found. Finally, the law apparently caused an increase in the number of those having to be readmitted. These results raise questions about the implementation of the law, the perception of dangerousness, and the need for more effective liaison between state hospitals and community-based treatment facilities.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Involuntary Commitment for Mental Disorder: The Application of California's Lanterman-Petris-Short ActLaw & Society Review, 1977
- Reformed Commitment Procedures: An Empirical Study in the CourtroomLaw & Society Review, 1977
- The Survivor: An Anatomy of Life in the Death CampsAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1976
- Dr. Rachlin and Associates ReplyAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1975
- A comparison of voluntary and involuntary patients in a state hospital.Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery, 1975
- Involuntary Hospitalization: What For and How Long?American Journal of Psychiatry, 1974
- Feldionenmikroskopische untersuchungen der wechselwirkungen von methan mit wolframSurface Science, 1972
- Continuing conjectual concepts concerning civil commitment criteria.American Psychologist, 1971
- Reforms as experiments.American Psychologist, 1969