Angiotensin receptor blockers and risk of myocardial infarction: systematic review
- 23 September 2005
- Vol. 331 (7521) , 873
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38595.518542.3a
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the effect of angiotensin receptor blockers on the risk of myocardial infarction in patients at risk for cardiovascular events. Design Systematic review of controlled trials of angiotensin receptor blockers. Data sources Medline, Embase, Cochrane central register of controlled trials, hand search, and contact with investigators. Selection of studies Predefined criteria were used to select controlled clinical trials comparing use of angiotensin receptor blockers with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or placebo in patients at risk for cardiovascular events. Data were extracted for patients' characteristics, interventions, quality of trials, and rates of myocardial infarction. Results 19 studies with 31 569 patients were included in the analysis. Two studies investigated the use of angiotensin receptor blockers in hypertensive patients, four studies in patients with diabetes and nephropathy, 10 studies in patients with heart failure, and three in patients with recent myocardial infarction or ischaemic syndrome. 11 studies of 21 062 patients allowed for comparison between angiotensin receptor blockers and placebo; nine studies of 10 625 patients allowed for comparison between angiotensin receptor blockers and ACE inhibitors. Use of angiotensin receptor blockers was not associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction compared with placebo (odds ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.75 to 1.16) nor with increased risk of myocardial infarction compared with ACE inhibitors (1.01, 0.87 to 1.16). Conclusions Treatment with angiotensin receptor blockers was not associated with a significantly increased risk of myocardial infarction. The 95% confidence intervals do, however, not exclude an increase of up to 16% in the risk of myocardial infarction or a reduction in risk of up to 25%. Until further information specifically dealing with this issue is available from large prospective trials, our findings may alleviate recent concerns over the safety of this class of medications.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of 2 large, simple, randomized trials evaluating telmisartan, ramipril, and their combination in high-risk patients: the Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial/Telmisartan Randomized Assessment Study in ACE Intolerant Subjects with Cardiovascular Disease (ONTARGET/TRANSCEND) trialsAmerican Heart Journal, 2004
- Angiotensin receptor blockers and heart failure: still CHARMing after VALIANT?Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2004
- Effects of low-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker candesartan on cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery diseaseAmerican Heart Journal, 2003
- A Randomized Trial of the Angiotensin-Receptor Blocker Valsartan in Chronic Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- HEART FAILURE: Angiotensin receptor blockers for chronic heart failure and acute myocardial infarctionHeart, 2001
- Effects of the replacement of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril by the angiotensin II receptor blocker telmisartan in patients with congestive heart failure: The replacement of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition (REPLACE) investigatorsInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2001
- Randomised trial of losartan versus captopril in patients over 65 with heart failure (Evaluation of Losartan in the Elderly Study, ELITE)Published by Elsevier ,1997
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Effects of Enalapril on Mortality in Severe Congestive Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986