AUTOSHAPING IN THE RAT: EFFECTS OF OMISSION ON THE FORM OF THE RESPONSE
- 1 July 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Vol. 36 (1) , 75-91
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1981.36-75
Abstract
Two experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of an omission contingency on behavior related to and characterizing autoshaped lever contacts in the rat. In Experiment I an omission contingency imposed on autoshaped lever contacts forceful enough to produce a press (.078N) resulted in a significant decrease in lever presses, but had no effect on frequency of lever touches (contacts of insufficient force to produce a press) or rate of food tray entry during lever presentation. In contrast, rats which received a similar number of lever-food pairings, but whose behavior had no programmed consequences (yoked control subjects), showed an increase in lever press rate, a significant decrease in rate of food tray entry, and no change in rate of lever-touches. In Experiment II, the effect of a similar omission contingency on the topography of lever contact responses was investigated. Prior to omission training subjects contacted the lever primarily by pawing it. Following omission training this behavior was suppressed, with a subsequent increase in lever contacts characterized as nosing. Yoked control subjects showed no significant changes in lever contact topography. The results indicate that (1) an omission contingency does not simply eliminate wholesale those topographies which incur the contingency but produces subtle adaptive changes in lever contact topography; and (2) the nature of the autoshaped response in the rat does not appear to be rigid enough to depend solely upon the nature of the unconditioned stimulus or the conditioned stimulus, but can also be determined by the relationships existing between the animal's behavior and these stimuli.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Influence of visual conditioned stimulus characteristics on the form of Pavlovian appetitive conditioned responding in rats.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1980
- Differential effects of omission contingencies on various components of Pavlovian appetitive conditioned responding in rats.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1979
- Superstitious behavior for food and water in the ratPhysiology & Behavior, 1977
- The control of keypecks during automaintenance by prekeypeck omission trainingLearning & Behavior, 1975
- LEVER‐CONTACT RESPONSES IN RATS: AUTOMAINTENANCE WITH AND WITHOUT A NEGATIVE RESPONSE‐REINFORCER DEPENDENCY1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974
- CENTRIFUGAL SELECTION OF SIGNAL‐DIRECTED PECKING1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974
- Conditioned Approach and Contact Behavior toward Signals for Food or Brain-Stimulation ReinforcementScience, 1972
- TWO DIFFERENT KINDS OF KEY PECK IN THE PIGEON: SOME PROPERTIES OF RESPONSES MAINTAINED BY NEGATIVE AND POSITIVE RESPONSE‐REINFORCER CONTINGENCIES1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1972
- AUTO‐MAINTENANCE IN THE PIGEON: SUSTAINED PECKING DESPITE CONTINGENT NON‐REINFORCEMENT2Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1969
- Behaviour Components in the Feeding of Wild and Laboratory RatsBehaviour, 1956