Comparison of Four Biofeedback Treatments for Migraine Headache: Physiological and Headache Variables*
- 1 September 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Psychosomatic Medicine
- Vol. 42 (5) , 463-480
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-198009000-00001
Abstract
Migraine headache patients (42) participated in an appraisal of biofeedback for differential finger warming-forehead cooling, frontalis EMG (electromyogram) relaxation, alpha enhancement and vasoconstriction of the temporal scalp arteries. All patients provided 8 wk of baseline charting of headache, and then received 24 training sessions in one of the above conditions. Headache charting continued throughout training and for 8 mo. post-training. During the training period, measurements were taken of each biofeedback variable plus forehead temperature, heart rate, skin conductance and finger pulse amplitude. Analyses revealed that all groups had a significant reduction in number of headaches per week with no change in intensity, disability or length of headache. Physiological changes were consistently small and unrelated to headache outcome. A nonspecific effect for biofeedback is suggested with the likely candidates being a relaxation phenomenon or a cognitive explanation based upon perceived control.This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measures of Forehead and Finger Temperature, Frontalis EMG, Heart Rate and Finger Pulse Amplitude During and Between Migraine HeadachesHeadache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 1980
- A Modular System For Detecting and Displaying Plethysmographic Blood Volume Pulse AmplitudePsychophysiology, 1979
- Evidence for Physiological Response Stereotypy in Migraine HeadachePsychosomatic Medicine, 1978