The Police Lineup
- 1 December 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Criminal Justice and Behavior
- Vol. 22 (4) , 347-372
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854895022004001
Abstract
Police lineups are an essential tool of justice but remain dangerous. Six problems still to be dealt with sufficiently are (a) the overbelief in lineup “identifications,” (b) the all-or-none nature of the lineup, (c) similarity of the foils to the suspect, (d) similarity of innocent suspects to the offender, (e) failures to choose the offender, and (f) the small size of the lineup. This article discusses these problems and suggests a radical departure in procedure. The proposed method would have witnesses view more than a hundred foils, have them choose foils by their own judgment of similarity to the offender, and allow multiple choices from the lineup.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Expert testimony about eyewitness identification: A critique.Law and Human Behavior, 1993
- Nonadversarial Methods for Sensitizing Jurors to Eyewitness EvidenceJournal of Applied Social Psychology, 1990
- Expert testimony and jury decision making: An empirical analysisBehavioral Sciences & the Law, 1989
- Identification from a computer-driven retrieval system compared with a traditional mug-shot album search: a new tool for police investigationsErgonomics, 1989
- The eyewitness, the expert psychologist, and the jury.Law and Human Behavior, 1989
- The reliability of eyewitness identification: The role of system and estimator variables.Law and Human Behavior, 1987
- Nearly 2,000 witnesses can be wrongBulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1980
- Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Can we infer anything about their relationship?Law and Human Behavior, 1980
- Effects of interpolated mugshot exposure on accuracy of eyewitness identification.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1979
- Eyewitness identification: Photographs vs. live models.Law and Human Behavior, 1977