The eyewitness, the expert psychologist, and the jury.
- 1 January 1989
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Law and Human Behavior
- Vol. 13 (3) , 311-332
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01067032
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 61 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Lineup construction and presentation.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1988
- Correlation of eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Optimality hypothesis revisited.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1987
- Psychologists and the judicial system: Broader perspectives.Law and Human Behavior, 1986
- Personal values and expert testimony.Law and Human Behavior, 1986
- Two conjectures about the issue of expert testimony.Law and Human Behavior, 1986
- Opinions of attorneys and law enforcement personnel on the accuracy of eyewitness identifications.Law and Human Behavior, 1983
- The ability of prospective jurors to estimate the accuracy of eyewitness identifications.Law and Human Behavior, 1983
- Accuracy of eyewitness identification in a field setting.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982
- Making Legal Language Understandable: A Psycholinguistic Study of Jury InstructionsColumbia Law Review, 1979
- Legal communication: An investigation of juror comprehension of pattern instructionsCommunication Quarterly, 1978