Simultaneous comparison of sensitivity and specificity of two tests in the paired design: a straightforward graphical approach
- 5 March 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 20 (6) , 907-915
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.906
Abstract
Often the performances of two binary diagnostic or screening tests are compared by applying them to the same set of subjects, some of whom are affected, some unaffected. The McNemar test, and corresponding interval estimation methods, may be used to compare the sensitivity of the two tests, but this disregards both any observed difference in specificity and its imprecision due to sampling variation. The suggested approach is to display point and interval estimates for a weighted mean ƒ of the differences in sensitivity and specificity between the two tests. The mixing parameter λ, which is allowed to range from 0 to 1, represents the prevalence in the population to which application is envisaged, together with the relative seriousness of false positives and false negatives. The confidence interval for ƒ is obtained by a simple extension of a closed‐form method for the paired difference of proportions, which has favourable coverage properties and is based on the Wilson single proportion score method. A plot of ƒ against λ is readily obtained using a Minitab macro. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Approximate Is Better than "Exact" for Interval Estimation of Binomial ProportionsThe American Statistician, 1998
- Equivalence test and confidence interval for the difference in proportions for the paired-sample designStatistics in Medicine, 1998
- Authors' replyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1997
- Comparison of three faecal occult blood tests in the detection of colorectal neoplasia.Gut, 1996
- On the sample size for one‐sided equivalence of sensitivities based upon McNemar's testStatistics in Medicine, 1995
- Confidence Intervals for Probabilities and Tolerance Regions Based on a Generalization of the Mann-Whitney StatisticJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1990
- Confidence Intervals for Probabilities and Tolerance Regions Based on a Generalization of the Mann-Whitney StatisticJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1990
- A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960
- The Combination of Probabilities Arising from Data in Discrete DistributionsBiometrika, 1949
- THE COMBINATION OF PROBABILITIES ARISING FROM DATA IN DISCRETE DISTRIBUTIONSBiometrika, 1949