Reproducibility with the Keeler Pulsair 2000 non-contact tonometer.
Open Access
- 1 June 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Vol. 79 (6) , 554-557
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.79.6.554
Abstract
AIMS--The IOP variation on repeated testing with the recently introduced Keeler Pulsair 2000 instrument was investigated. METHODS--One hundred normal individuals (50 male and 50 female) new to the instrument had three sets of IOP recordings within a 15 minute time period. RESULTS--The mean of the first set of IOPs from both right and left eyes was significantly higher than those from subsequent sets (p < 0.0001 for right eyes and p = 0.01 and < 0.0002 for left eyes). This tendency increased significantly with increasing IOP. Second and third IOP sets were, however, similar indicating stabilisation of IOP measurements. The coefficient of repeatability of the instrument between second and third sets was 4.2 mm Hg for right eyes and 3.6 mm Hg for left eyes. CONCLUSION--The Pulsair 2000 passes the British standard for reproducibility of a standard test method.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 2000 non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanationEye, 1993
- Intra-eye pressure range and pulse profiles in normals with the pulsair non-contact tonometerEye, 1993
- How optometrists screen for glaucoma: A surveyOphthalmic and Physiological Optics, 1992
- Do optometrists screen for glaucoma?Eye, 1989
- Evaluation of the Keeler Pulsair non‐contact tonometerActa Ophthalmologica, 1989
- Comparison of a new non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanationEye, 1989
- Non-contact tonometry in the postoperative eye.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1989
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- EFFECTS OF REPEATED TONOMETRY: GENUINE AND SHAM MEASUREMENTSActa Ophthalmologica, 1972
- A NEW TONOMETER SYSTEMOptometry and Vision Science, 1972