Being attractive, advantage or disadvantage? Performance-based evaluations and recommended personnel actions as a function of appearance, sex, and job type
- 27 July 2004
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier
- Vol. 35 (2) , 202-215
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(85)90035-4
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- When beauty is beastly: The effects of appearance and sex on evaluations of job applicants for managerial and nonmanagerial jobsPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Affirmative action, negative reaction? Some moderating conditionsOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1984
- Applicant Attractiveness as a Perceived Job-Relevant Variable in Selection of Management Trainees.The Academy of Management Journal, 1982
- Physical AttractivenessPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1981
- Expectancy confirmation processes arising in the social interaction sequence.American Psychologist, 1980
- Sex and physical attractiveness of raters and applicants as determinants of resumé evaluations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977
- Sexism and beautyism in personnel consultant decision making.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977
- Relative importance of applicant sex, attractiveness, and scholastic standing in evaluation of job applicant resumes.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975
- Beauty is talent: Task evaluation as a function of the performer's physical attractiveness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974
- What is beautiful is good.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972