Methodologic Sources of Inconsistent Prognoses for Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction
Open Access
- 1 June 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 98 (6) , 537-550
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9343(99)80012-6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 125 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effect of Diltiazem on Mortality and Reinfarction after Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987
- Digoxin Therapy and Mortality after Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- The Autopsy as a Measure of Accuracy of the Death CertificateNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Clinical Prediction RulesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Type A Behavior and Survival after Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Risk Stratification and Survival after Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Determinants of Prognosis in Survivors of Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Timolol-Induced Reduction in Mortality and Reinfarction in Patients Surviving Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981