HOW ACCURATE ARE REFERENCES IN THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY?
- 1 July 1997
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Anz Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 67 (7) , 417-419
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.1997.tb02005.x
Abstract
Background: The accuracy of reference citations in The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery was evaluated. All of the references from 1995 (Volume 65) were included (n= 4092). Methods: A sample of 100 references was randomly selected and examined in detail by comparison with the original references. Results: Overall, 60% of citations contained errors. Errors were categorized by dividing references into six elements. A total of 38.8% of citations contained an error in one element, 15.6% contained errors in two elements, 4.4% contained errors in three elements, and 4.4% contained errors in four elements of the reference. The most common errors were errors of authors' names and errors in the title. Conclusions: Contributors to this journal should take more care in checking references in their manuscripts before publication.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- The accuracy of references in AnaesthesiaAnaesthesia, 1995
- Trust, but VerifyAnesthesiology, 1992
- Quotational and reference accuracy in surgical journals. A continuing peer review problemJAMA, 1990
- A Survey of Reference Accuracy in Five National Dental JournalsJournal of Dental Research, 1989
- How accurate are quotations and references in medical journals?BMJ, 1985