Does Competition Solve the Hold-up Problem?
Preprint
- 1 April 2000
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
In an environment in which both buyers and sellers can undertake match specific investments, the presence of market competition for matches may solve hold-up and coordination problems generated by the absence of complete contingent contracts. In particular, this paper shows that when matching is assortative and sellers' investments precede market competition then investments are constrained efficient. One equilibrium is efficient with efficient matches but also there can be equilibria with coordination failures. Different types of inefficiency arise when buyers undertake investment before market competition. These inefficiencies lead to buyers' under-investments due to a hold-up problem but, when competition is at its peak, there is a unique equilibrium of the competition game with efficient matches -- no coordination failures -- and the aggregate hold-up inefficiency is small in a well defined sense independent of market size.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transplants and Implants: The Economics of Self‐ImprovementInternational Economic Review, 2001
- Holdups and Efficiency with Search FrictionsInternational Economic Review, 1999
- When Does Competition Lead to Efficient Investments?SSRN Electronic Journal, 1999
- Strict Monotonicity in Comparative StaticsJournal of Economic Theory, 1998
- Training and Innovation in an Imperfect Labour MarketThe Review of Economic Studies, 1997
- Formal and Real Authority in OrganizationsJournal of Political Economy, 1997
- Renegotiation Design with Unverifiable InformationEconometrica, 1994
- Incomplete Contracts, Vertical Integration, and Supply AssuranceThe Review of Economic Studies, 1993
- Coordinating Coordination Failures in Keynesian ModelsThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1988
- Wage Determination and Efficiency in Search EquilibriumThe Review of Economic Studies, 1982