Distraction Osteogenesis of the Craniofacial Skeleton
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Vol. 107 (1) , 278-280
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200101000-00050
Abstract
In summary, distraction osteogenesis is a safe and effective means of achieving bone lengthening. These techniques were originally applied to the long bones of the extremities; over the past 10 years they have been effectively applied to the bones of the craniofacial skeleton. The new bone regenerate that is observed after distraction osteogenesis is stable, and relapse rates after skeletal advancement are believed to be lower than with conventional osteotomy and bone graft techniques. There is considerable variability in distraction protocols employed in clinical practice, including differences in the types of devices used and in the rate, rhythm, latency, and period of consolidation for distraction osteogenesis. The greatest application for distraction osteogenesis in the craniofacial skeleton has been with mandible lengthening, for which there is presently a 10-year clinical experience. Midfacial advancement is a newer application of distraction osteogenesis, for which clinical experience has been accrued over the past 5 years. This latter experience indicates that distraction osteogenesis is a viable treatment option for lengthening of the hypoplastic mandible and midface. These techniques have advantages over conventional means of bone graft and rigid fixation because of the quality of the bone regenerate, the decrease in the long-term relapse rate of the advanced bone segments in both the mandible and the midface, and the simultaneous soft-tissue elongation that accompanies the distraction process. Distraction osteogenesis is particularly applicable to the correction of severe deformities of the mandible and midface in children with developmental hypoplasia and syndromic craniosynostosis. However, growth is an added variable in this patient population. The amount of overcorrection in lengthening of the hypoplastic bone required to compensate for continued growth discrepancy of the adjacent facial bones is difficult to predict. Therefore, the families of these patients should be informed that many children will require repeated operations at a later age as they reach skeletal maturity.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Craniofacial Distraction OsteogenesisThe Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 1999
- Intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesisSeminars in Orthodontics, 1999
- Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible:A ten-year experienceSeminars in Orthodontics, 1999
- Monobloc Distraction Osteogenesis during Infancy: Report of a Case and Presentation of a New DevicePlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1998
- Le Fort III Advancement with Gradual Distraction Using Internal DevicesPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1997
- Management of Severe Maxillary Deficiency in Childhood and Adolescence Through Distraction Osteogenesis With an External, Adjustable, Rigid Distraction DeviceThe Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 1997
- Mandibular Elongation and Remodeling by DistractionPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1995
- Lengthening the Human Mandible by Gradual DistractionPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1992
- The Tension-Stress Effect on the Genesis and Growth of TissuesClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1989