Patients rate physician communication about lung cancer
Open Access
- 14 April 2011
- Vol. 117 (22) , 5212-5220
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26152
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High‐quality lung cancer care includes physician‐patient communication about the disease and treatment, patient needs/preferences, and care goals. In this study, the authors evaluated communication with patients at all stages across multiple topics. METHODS: A standardized questionnaire asked patients with lung cancer to rate (on 5‐point, verbal descriptor scale) the extent of communication with physicians on symptoms, spiritual concerns, practical needs, proxy appointment, living will preparation, prognosis, care goals, potential complications of therapy, life support preferences, and hospice. Communication was defined as inadequate if the patient reported discussing ≥5 of 11 questionnaire topics “not at all” or “a little bit.” Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the factors associated with inadequate communication. RESULTS: In total, 276 of 348 (79%) eligible patients were enrolled (mean age [±standard deviation], 65 ± 10 years; 55% white, 21% black, and 19% Hispanic; all disease stages). For most topics, the majority of respondents reported that physicians communicated “not at all” or “a little bit.” Low ratings were frequent for discussion of emotional symptoms (56%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 49%‐62%), practical needs (71%; 95% CI, 65%‐76%), spiritual concerns (80%; 95% CI, 75%‐85%), proxy appointment (63%; 95% CI, 57%‐69%), living will preparation (90%; 95% CI, 85%‐93%), life support preferences (80%; 95% CI, 75%‐84%), and hospice (88%; 95% CI, 86%‐94%). Communication was inadequate for patients of different ages, stages, and races, although Hispanics were less likely than non‐Hispanic whites and blacks to report inadequate communication (odds ratio, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.15‐0.65). CONCLUSIONS: Across all stages, patients with lung cancer reported low rates of physician‐patient communication on key topics, which may increase patient distress, impair decision‐making, and compromise clinical outcomes and use patterns. Cancer 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differences in Patient–Provider Communication for Hispanic Compared to Non-Hispanic White Patients in HIV CareJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2010
- Physician factors associated with discussions about end‐of‐life careCancer, 2010
- Discussions With Physicians About Hospice Among Patients With Metastatic Lung CancerArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2009
- Palliative Care for Latino Patients and Their FamiliesJAMA, 2009
- Health Care Costs in the Last Week of LifeArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2009
- Associations Between End-of-Life Discussions, Patient Mental Health, Medical Care Near Death, and Caregiver Bereavement AdjustmentJAMA, 2008
- Missed Opportunities for Interval Empathy in Lung Cancer CommunicationArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2008
- “What concerns me is…” Expression of emotion by advanced cancer patients during outpatient visitsSupportive Care in Cancer, 2007
- The Medical Dialogue: Disentangling Differences between Hispanic and non-Hispanic WhitesJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2007
- Efficacy of a Cancer Research UK communication skills training model for oncologists: a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2002