Visual Search of Good and Poor Readers: Effects with Targets Having Single and Combined Features
- 1 June 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perceptual and Motor Skills
- Vol. 82 (3_suppl) , 1155-1167
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1996.82.3c.1155
Abstract
This study examined differences between normal and poor readers in the visual-search strategy used to detect a target shape in a background of similar shapes. No differences between the two groups occur in search for simple features (Exps. 1 and 3) and conjunction of features (Exp. 2). However, the performance of the two groups differ on search tasks with multifeatured shapes, in which targets and nontargets differ in both the identity of features and their spatial relationship or in the spatial relationship of features alone. Results suggest that, rather than a problem in searching complex stimuli, poor searchers have difficulty within stimuli like letters and geometrical shapes which require integration of features within a module of the visual system.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Preattentive Vision and Perceptual GroupsPerception, 1990
- ‘Where’ and ‘What’ in Visual SearchPerception, 1989
- Grouping processes in visual search: Effects with single- and combined-feature targets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1989
- Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review, 1989
- Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries.Psychological Review, 1988
- Peripheral Vision in Persons with DyslexiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- "Where" and "What" in VisionScience, 1985
- Specific Reading Disability: Differences in Contrast Sensitivity as a Function of Spatial FrequencyScience, 1980
- A feature-integration theory of attentionCognitive Psychology, 1980
- Reading disability: Spatial frequency specific deficits in visual information storeNeuropsychologia, 1980