Bandwagon Influences And Installed-Base Conversion In U.S. Telecommunications
- 1 January 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Economics of Innovation and New Technology
- Vol. 4 (2) , 113-122
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599600000003
Abstract
The idea that firms are subject to bandwagon or imitation influences occupies a key position as an explanatory variable in the literature on technology adoption and diffusion. This study examines whether bandwagon influences help to explain differences in the patterns of conversion to a new technology, electronic switching, across firms in the U.S. telecommunications industry. The sample analyzed consists of 40 of the largest firms in the local operating sector of the industry, and firm-level data collected for the years 1973, 1978, 1981, 1984, and 1987 are used to undertake the analysis. The results strongly support the bandwagon hypothesis as a key influence on firm's technology adoption or conversion decisions.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Competition in a Network Industry: The Telephone Industry, 1894–1910The Journal of Economic History, 1994
- Analyzing the underlying dimensions of firm profitabilityManagerial and Decision Economics, 1993
- The Innovation Diffusion Process in a Heterogeneous Population: A Micromodeling ApproachManagement Science, 1990
- The Economics Of Compatibility Standards: An Introduction To Recent Research1Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1990
- Mimetic Processes Within an Interorganizational Field: An Empirical TestAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1989
- Environmental Scanning in Korean Firms: Organizational Isomorphism in ActionJournal of International Business Studies, 1988
- Standardization, Compatibility, and InnovationThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1985
- Asymptotic Theory of Least Absolute Error RegressionJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1978
- Regression with Non-Gaussian Stable Disturbances: Some Sampling ResultsEconometrica, 1971
- Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic TheoryJournal of Political Economy, 1950