Comparison of eligible randomized patients with two groups of ineligible patients: Can the results of the VA total parenteral nutrition clinical trial be generalized?
- 1 September 1993
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 46 (9) , 1025-1034
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)90170-6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Perusing the literatureControlled Clinical Trials, 1987
- Extracranial-intracranial bypass, one; clinical trials, nil.BMJ, 1987
- The Extracranial–Intracranial Arterial Bypass StudyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Are the Results of the Extracranial–Intracranial Bypass Trial Generalizable?New England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- The Extracranial–Intracranial Bypass StudyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Was the International Randomized Trial of Extracranial-Intracranial Arterial Bypass Representative of the Population at Risk?New England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Failure of Extracranial–Intracranial Arterial Bypass to Reduce the Risk of Ischemic StrokeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- The International Cooperative Study of Extracranial/Intracranial Arterial Anastomosis (EC/IC Bypass Study): methodology and entry characteristics. The EC/IC Bypass Study group.Stroke, 1985
- Coronary artery surgery study (CASS): A randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery: Comparability of entry characteristics and survival in randomized patients and nonrandomized patients meeting randomization criteriaJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1984
- A comparison between participants and non-participants in a primary preventive trialJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1976