Finance: Function Matters, Not Size
- 1 February 2013
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in Journal of Economic Perspectives
- Vol. 27 (2) , 29-50
- https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.27.2.29
Abstract
It's fun to pass judgment on waste, size, usefulness, complexity, and excessive compensation. But as economists, we have an analytical structure for thinking about these questions. “I don't understand it” doesn't mean “it's bad,” or “regulation will improve it.” That attitude pervades policy analysis in general and financial regulation in particular, and economists do the world a disservice if we echo it. I will not offer a competing black box [to explain the size of the finance industry]. I don't claim to estimate the socially optimal “size of finance” at, say, 8.267 percent of GDP. It's just the wrong question. Hayek and the failure of planning should teach us a little modesty: Pronouncing on socially optimal industry size is a waste of time. Is the finance industry functioning well? Are there identifiable market or government distortions? Will proposed regulations help or make matters worse? These are useful questions.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Luck versus Skill in the Cross‐Section of Mutual Fund ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 2010
- Dissecting AnomaliesThe Journal of Finance, 2008
- Presidential Address: The Cost of Active InvestingThe Journal of Finance, 2008
- Five Myths of Active Portfolio ManagementThe Journal of Portfolio Management, 2005
- Mutual Fund Flows and Performance in Rational MarketsJournal of Political Economy, 2004
- Overconfidence and Speculative BubblesJournal of Political Economy, 2003
- Inflation and WelfareEconometrica, 2000
- Risk Taking by Mutual Funds as a Response to IncentivesJournal of Political Economy, 1997
- Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing AnomaliesThe Journal of Finance, 1996
- Continuous Auctions and Insider TradingEconometrica, 1985