Performance Characteristics of Five New Anesthesia Ventilators and Four Intensive Care Ventilators in Pressure-support Mode
- 1 November 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesiology
- Vol. 105 (5) , 944-952
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200611000-00015
Abstract
Background: During the past few years, many manufacturers have introduced new modes of ventilation in anesthesia ventilators, especially partial-pressure modalities. The current bench test study was designed to compare triggering and pressurization of five new anesthesia ventilators with four intensive care unit ventilators. Methods: Ventilators were connected to a two-compartment lung model. One compartment was driven by an intensive care unit ventilator to mimic "patient" inspiratory effort, whereas the other was connected to the tested ventilator. The settings of ventilators were positive end-expiratory pressures of 0 and 5 cm H2O, and pressure-support ventilation levels of 10, 15, and 20 cm H2O with normal and high "patient" inspiratory effort. For the anesthesia ventilators, all the measurements were obtained for a low (1 l/min) and a high (10 l/min) fresh gas flow. Triggering delay, triggering workload, and pressurization at 300 and 500 ms were analyzed. Results: For the five tested anesthesia ventilators, the pressure-support ventilation modality functioned correctly. For inspiratory triggering, the three most recent anesthesia machines (Fabius, Drägerwerk AG, Lübeck, Germany; Primus, Drägerwerk AG; and Avance, GE-Datex-Ohemda, Munchen, Germany) had a triggering delay of less than 100 ms, which is considered clinically satisfactory and is comparable to intensive care unit machines. The use of positive end-expiratory pressure modified the quality of delivered pressure support for two anesthesia ventilators (Kion, Siemens AG, Munich, Germany; and Felix, Taema, Antony, France). Three of the five anesthesia ventilators exhibited pressure-support ventilation performance characteristics comparable to those of the intensive care unit machines. Increasing fresh gas flow (1 to 10 l/min) in the internal circuit did not influence the pressure-support ventilation performance of the anesthesia ventilators. Conclusion: Regarding trigger sensitivity and the system's ability to meet inspiratory flow during pressure-supported breaths, the most recent anesthesia ventilators have comparable performances of recent-generation intensive care unit ventilators.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of inspiratory time on tidal volume delivery in anesthesia and intensive care unit ventilators operating in pressure control modeJournal of Clinical Anesthesia, 2005
- Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in New-generation Mechanical VentilatorsAnesthesiology, 2002
- Long-Term Effects of Spontaneous Breathing During Ventilatory Support in Patients with Acute Lung InjuryAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2001
- Volume Ventilation of Infants with Congenital Heart Disease: A Comparison of Dräger, NAD 6000 and Siemens, Servo 900C VentilatorsAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2001
- Pressure Support Ventilation versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure with the Laryngeal Mask AirwayAnesthesiology, 2000
- Étude des performances de six nouveaux ventilateurs d'anesthésie : banc d'essaiAnnales Françaises dʼAnesthésie et de Réanimation, 2000
- Maintaining spontaneous breathing efforts during mechanical ventilatory supportIntensive Care Medicine, 1999
- Pressure support improves efficiency of spontaneous breathing during inhalation anesthesiaJournal of Clinical Anesthesia, 1996
- Phrenic Nerve Stimulation during Halothane AnesthesiaAnesthesiology, 1994
- Pressure Support Ventilation Decreases Inspiratory Work of Breathing During General Anesthesia and Spontaneous VentilationAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1992