Reference Values in White Europeans for the Arterial Pulse Wave Recorded by Means of the SphygmoCor Device
- 1 January 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Japanese Society of Hypertension in Hypertension Research
- Vol. 29 (7) , 475-483
- https://doi.org/10.1291/hypres.29.475
Abstract
Measurement of blood pressure together with applanation tonometry at the radial artery allows the reproducible assessment of various indexes of arterial stiffness, including the peripheral (PPp) and central pulse pressures (PPc) and the peripheral (Alp) and central augmentation indexes (Alc). We defined preliminary diagnostic thresholds, using the distributional characteristics of these hemodynamic measurements in a reference population. We randomly recruited 870 subjects from 3 European populations. PPp was the average difference between systolic and diastolic blood pressure measured five times at one home visit. For measurement of PPc, Alp and Alc, we used the SphygmoCor device. We selected subjects without hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia in need of medical treatment or previous or concomitant cardiovascular disease. The study population included 228 men and 306 women (mean age 34.9 years). All hemodynamic measurements were curvilinearly related to age, and Alp and Alc were lower in men than in women. In men at age 40, the upper 95% prediction bands of the relations of the hemodynamic measurements with age approximated 60 mmHg for PPp, 40 mmHg for PPc, 90% for Alp, and 30% for Alc. For PPc, Alp and Alc, these thresholds must be adjusted for age, leading to lower and higher thresholds at younger and older age, respectively. In addition, in women of any age, the Alp and Alc thresholds must be increased by 10% and 7%, respectively. Pending validation in prospective outcome studies, distributional characteristics of arterial stiffness indexes in a reference population can be used to generate operational thresholds for use in clinical practice.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reference values for clinic pulse pressure in a nonselected population.American Journal of Hypertension, 2001
- Reproducibility of radial pulse wave analysis in healthy subjectsJournal Of Hypertension, 2000
- Microalbuminuria and Pulse Pressure in Hypertensive and Atherosclerotic MenHypertension, 2000
- Reproducibility of pulse wave velocity and augmentation index measured by pulse wave analysisJournal Of Hypertension, 1998
- Pulse PressureHypertension, 1997
- Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleadingThe Lancet, 1995
- An analysis of the relationship between central aortic and peripheral upper limb pressure waves in manEuropean Heart Journal, 1993
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- Influence of ventricular ejection on the relationship between central aortic and brachial pressure pulse in manCardiovascular Research, 1970
- An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples)Biometrika, 1965