Clinical Comparison of Maphenide and Silver Sulphadiazine
- 1 January 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Vol. 13 (1) , 95-101
- https://doi.org/10.3109/02844317909013031
Abstract
A series of 645 consecutive burn injuries are analysed. There were 175 patients in the control group, 156 in the Maphenide (Sulfamylon) group and 314 in the Silver Sulphadiazine (S. S. D.) group. The Maphenide group and S.S.D. group are compared statistically with the control group. S.S.D. proved superior in relation to clinical infection rate and culture rate in reduction of Pseudomonas and Staphylococcus. Other culture rates were analysed. There were significant reductions in both groups for E. coli and Candida albicans. Pneumonias were significantly increased in both groups and the mortality rate reduced with S.S.D. Overall S.S.D. gave better results than Maphenide.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adjunct role of scintigraphy and bronchoscopy in the early diagnosis of respiratory burnsBurns, 1977
- Summing upBurns, 1977
- Drug resistance in relation to use of silver sulphadiazine cream in a burns unit.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1977
- ALTERNATIVE FORMS OF LOCAL TREATMENT FOR BURNSThe Lancet, 1971
- The Burn Wound and Its CareArchives of Surgery, 1971
- ADULT BURNS IN MELBOURNE A FIVE‐YEAR SURVEYThe Medical Journal of Australia, 1970
- THE OCCURRENCE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF PNEUMONIA AND OTHER PULMONARY COMPLICATIONS IN BURNED PATIENTSPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1970