Physician Pay-For-Performance.
Open Access
- 1 February 2006
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Vol. 21 (2) , S9-S13
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00356.x
Abstract
Recent research underscores the gaps that exist between evidence-based medical practices and the care that many patients actually receive. Recognizing this, large purchasers are experimenting with new reimbursement arrangements called pay-for-performance (P4P) that tie a portion of payments for physician services to measures of quality. Agency theory, from the discipline of economics, provides a perspective on the challenges P4P is likely to encounter. The focus of most P4P initiatives on medical group performance raises additional questions about its potential effectiveness as a catalyst for change.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Linking Physicians' Pay to the Quality of Care — A Major Experiment in the United KingdomNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Penetrating the “Black Box”: Financial Incentives for Enhancing the Quality of Physician ServicesMedical Care Research and Review, 2004
- Assessing the Influence of Incentives on Physicians and Medical GroupsMedical Care Research and Review, 2004
- Paying For Quality: Providers’ Incentives For Quality ImprovementHealth Affairs, 2004
- Disseminating Innovations in Health CareJAMA, 2003
- Many A Slip Between Cup And LipEvaluation Review, 2003
- The impact of financial incentives and a patient registry on preventive care quality: increasing provider adherence to evidence-based smoking cessation practice guidelinesPreventive Medicine, 2003
- Why Don't Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines?JAMA, 1999
- The Unintended Consequences of Measuring Quality on the Quality of Medical CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Performance-based physician reimbursement and influenza immunization rates in the elderlyAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 1998