Modifying the Major: Discretionary Thoughts from Ten Disciplines
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Project MUSE in The Review of Higher Education
- Vol. 18 (3) , 315-344
- https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1995.0017
Abstract
A content analysis of ten task force reports on improving the undergraduate major in ten liberal arts fields revealed that each discipline’s epistemological character strongly influenced methodology, pedagogy, and curricular innovation. These patterns were consistent with previous theory and research on disciplinary differences, suggesting that disciplinary traditions and perspectives may impede curricular reform. Pragmatic concerns, however, may encourage faculty to move beyond such impediments to change.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Will Disciplinary Perspectives Impede Curricular Reform?The Journal of Higher Education, 1994
- The Biglan classification revisitedResearch in Higher Education, 1993
- Disciplinary discourseStudies in Higher Education, 1987
- Scientific Establishments and Hierarchies.Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 1983
- Knowledge Structures: Methods for Exploring Course ContentThe Journal of Higher Education, 1983
- Validation of the Biglan modelResearch in Higher Education, 1982
- Research output, socialization, and the biglan modelResearch in Higher Education, 1981
- Reward structures of academic disciplinesResearch in Higher Education, 1978
- Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973
- The Structure of Scientific Fields and the Functioning of University Graduate DepartmentsAmerican Sociological Review, 1972