The social construction of criminal responsibility and insanity.
- 1 January 1991
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Law and Human Behavior
- Vol. 15 (4) , 349-376
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02074076
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ultimate opinion proscriptions: A cosmetic fix and a plea for empiricism.Law and Human Behavior, 1989
- How jurors construe "insanity."Law and Human Behavior, 1989
- Comparing females acquitted by reason of insanity, convicted, and civilly committed in Florida: 1977–1984.Law and Human Behavior, 1988
- Juror decision making: The importance of evidence.Law and Human Behavior, 1987
- Implicit theories of criminal responsibility: Decision making and the insanity defense.Law and Human Behavior, 1987
- AN ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC ATTITUDES TOWARD THE INSANITY DEFENSE*Criminology, 1986
- A Review of Research on the Insanity DefenseThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1986
- Evaluating insanity: A study of construct validity.Law and Human Behavior, 1984
- The death-qualified jury and the defense of insanity.Law and Human Behavior, 1984
- Insanity plea: Interexaminer agreement and concordance of psychiatric opinion and court verdict.Law and Human Behavior, 1981