Method to Develop Health Care Peer Groups for Quality and Financial Comparisons Across Hospitals
- 12 March 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Health Services Research
- Vol. 44 (2p1) , 577-592
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00916.x
Abstract
To develop and explore the characteristics of a novel "nearest neighbor" methodology for creating peer groups for health care facilities. Data were obtained from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) databases. Peer groups are developed by first calculating the multidimensional Euclidean distance between each of 133 VA medical centers based on 16 facility characteristics. Each medical center then serves as the center for its own peer group, and the nearest neighbor facilities in terms of Euclidean distance comprise the peer facilities. We explore the attributes and characteristics of the nearest neighbor peer groupings. In addition, we construct standard cluster analysis-derived peer groups and compare the characteristics of groupings from the two methodologies. The novel peer group methodology presented here results in groups where each medical center is at the center of its own peer group. Possible advantages over other peer group methodologies are that facilities are never on the "edge" of a group and group size-and thus group dispersion-is determined by the researcher. Peer groups with these characteristics may be more appealing to some researchers and administrators than standard cluster analysis and may thus strengthen organizational buy-in for financial and quality comparisons.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- The World Health Organization Performance Assessment Tool for Quality Improvement in Hospitals (PATH): An Analysis of the Pilot Implementation in 37 HospitalsInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2008
- Effect of Using Information From Only One System for Dually Eligible Health Care UsersMedical Care, 2006
- Comparison of the predictive validity of diagnosis-based risk adjusters for clinical outcomes.2005
- Peer group benchmarks are not appropriate for health care quality report cardsAmerican Heart Journal, 2004
- Impact of the choice of benchmark on the conclusions of hospital report cardsAmerican Heart Journal, 2004
- Performance Of The ‘100 Top Hospitals': What Does The Report Card Report?Health Affairs, 1999
- Increasing Use of Medicare Services by Veterans With Acute Myocardial InfarctionMedical Care, 1999
- Analysis, assessment, and presentation of risk-adjusted statewide obstetrical care data: the StORQS II study in Washington State. Statewide Obstetrics Review and Quality System.1998
- Creation of hospital peer groups.1995
- Insurance principles and the design of prospective payment systemsJournal of Health Economics, 1988