Effective Sampling Device And Mucopurulent Cervlcltls In Women With Chlamydial Cervical Infection

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Brushes (Cytobrushtm, Medscand) are superior to swabs for the collection of endocervical cells for cytologic examination. In the present randomized study, Cytobrush was compared with ENT‐swabs and with white, cotton‐tipped swabs to obtain samples for the diagnosis of chlamydial cervicitis. The women were examined for the presence of mucopurulent cervicitis (MPC). The subjects comprised 126 women, most of whom had been referred because of asymptomatic chlamydial infection. Specimens obtained with brushes were culture‐positive in 83 women and positive in a direct fluorescent antibody test (FA‐test) in 78 women. The corresponding figures for samples obtained with swabs were 80 and 74, respectively. The mean number of inclusions was significantly higher in samples obtained with brushes (4 999), compared with swabs (3 155), as was the mean number of elementary bodies (3 000 vs 2 481). MPC was detected in 65 % of the women with asymptomatic chlamydial cervicitis, and in 93% of those with symptomatic infection. The corresponding figures for a pathologic wet smear were 62% and 80%. respectively. The specificity and predictive values of a positive and negative MPC‐test was 21 %, 39%, and 86%, respectively, and for a pathologic wet smear 53%, 44%, and 85%, respectively. We conclude that brushes are superior to swabs for sampling material, both for culture and for direct FA‐tests. The MPC and the wet smear tests could be of value in the diagnosis of chlamydial cervicitis, providing confirmatory laboratory tests are used.