On the use of tester stocks to predict the competitive ability of genotypes
- 1 December 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Heredity
- Vol. 69 (6) , 489-495
- https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1992.163
Abstract
It has been recently claimed that the outcome of competition between two phenotypically indistinguishable strains cannot be predicted from comparisons of their respective performances against a mutant tester stock. Our aim in the present paper is to disprove this claim and to show the potential pitfalls of deriving conclusions from a statistical analysis of experimental designs commonly employed for the study of competitive interactions in genetically homogeneous and heterogeneous mixtures. Using our own data, we conclude that evaluating the competitive interactions of phenotypically indistinguishable wild-type strains by competing them against mutant marked stocks still remains a valuable method.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the analysis of viability data: an example with DrosophilaHeredity, 1990
- The biometrical genetics of competitive parameters in Drosophila melanogasterHeredity, 1990
- Analysis of competitive interactions in triocultures of Drosophila melanogasterHeredity, 1990
- Larval competition in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Comparing biological and competitive parametersHeredity, 1988
- A comparison of substitution and addition designs for the analysis of competitive interactions in Drosophila melanogasterHeredity, 1987
- Variation in male fertility explains an apparent effect of genotypic diversity on success in larval competition in Drosophila melanogasterHeredity, 1986
- A Biometrics Invited Paper. The Analysis and Selection of Variables in Linear RegressionPublished by JSTOR ,1976
- COMPETITION AMONG GENOTYPES IN THE HOUSEFLY AT VARYING DENSITIES AND PROPORTIONS (THEGREENSTRAIN)Evolution, 1964
- The estimation of viabilitiesJournal of Genetics, 1956
- The Use of TransformationsPublished by JSTOR ,1947